Every rent NASS published here
- No 2024 estimate to compare
- 47% below the Idaho average ($63)
- Coefficient of variation: 7.6%
- Down $5 (−1.7%) from 2025
- about even with the Idaho average ($287)
- Coefficient of variation: 4.6%
- Down $6 (−21.4%) from 2025
- 29% above the Idaho average ($17)
- Coefficient of variation: 18.5%
| Land type | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-irrigated cropland | — | $33.50 | — |
| Irrigated cropland | $284 | $291 | $286 |
| Pasture | $29 | $28 | $22 |
— means NASS did not publish a county estimate that year (too few reports, or withheld to protect respondents). We never fill the gap.
Bingham County against the counties that touch it
Irrigated cropland, 2026. The 7 bordering counties with a published rent average $173 an acre, so Bingham County sits 66% above its neighbors.
| # | County | $/acre | vs Bingham | 1-yr change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power County | $290 | +$4 | −4.6% |
| 2 | Bingham County | $286 | — | −1.7% |
| 3 | Butte County | $178 | −$108 | +3.5% |
| 4 | Jefferson County | $168 | −$118 | +3.1% |
| 5 | Bannock County | $167 | −$119 | +5.7% |
| 6 | Bonneville County | $146 | −$140 | +4.3% |
| 7 | Caribou County | $140 | −$146 | +9.4% |
| 8 | Blaine County | $120 | −$166 | +10.1% |
In the NASS East district, Bingham County ranks #2 of 16 on irrigated cropland rent.
Can your crop budget carry $33.50?
The county average is what tenants paid, not what the ground can earn. Plug in your own yield, price and costs to see the most rent your budget supports, and how that compares with the 2025 non-irrigated cropland average for Bingham County. The starting values are a generic corn example, not Bingham County figures. Replace them.
Run your numbers
Example values are loaded to show how the tool works. Replace every field with your own records or planning assumptions. Nothing entered here leaves your browser.
What the assumptions produce
Residual after non-land costs and target return.
Per-acre ceiling multiplied by rented acres.
Calculated rent ceiling as a share of crop revenue.
Yield revenue plus other entered revenue.
Compare your result with the Bingham County non-irrigated cropland average.
More East district counties
All Idaho counties →The fight over the ground
When rural desperation rewrites energy policy
An Idaho county that banned solar is reconsidering. The real story: drought-crushed farms and vanishing rural services are forcing a choice between purity and survival.
Crushed by Debt: Farmers Struggle with Fertilizer Costs
Farmers face historically volatile fertilizer markets, leading to financial challenges and debt accumulation.
Forage Farmers Get Revenue Protection — But Only in 12 States
USDA expands crop insurance to cover revenue loss for hay and pasture growers in select states. A step toward financial stability for a sector left behind.
Where these numbers come from
- Every rent on these pages is a published estimate from the USDA NASS Cash Rents Survey: the average cash rent paid per acre for non-irrigated cropland, irrigated cropland and pasture. We pull the 2024–2026 county and state series straight from Quick Stats.
- NASS skips counties with too few survey reports, or withholds them to protect respondents, and lumps them into an "other counties" total. Those counties get no page here, and missing years show as a dash. We do not estimate, average or interpolate around the gaps.
- The coefficient of variation (CV) is NASS's measure of sampling precision. Lower is tighter; the higher the CV, the wider the real range around the county figure.
- "Bordering counties" are the ones that share a boundary under the Census Bureau county adjacency file, including across state lines.
- An average rent is a benchmark, not a fair price for a specific field. Soil, drainage, fertility, improvements and lease terms all move the number.
Data last refreshed October 8, 2026.