Every rent NASS published here
- No 2025 estimate to compare
- 21% below the Massachusetts average ($97.50)
- Coefficient of variation: 12.7%
- Down $41 (−10.6%) from 2025
- 16% above the Massachusetts average ($297)
- Coefficient of variation: 17.2%
| Land type | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-irrigated cropland | — | — | $77.50 |
| Irrigated cropland | — | $386 | $345 |
— means NASS did not publish a county estimate that year (too few reports, or withheld to protect respondents). We never fill the gap.
Essex County against the counties that touch it
Non-irrigated cropland, 2026. The 1 bordering county with a published rent average $65 an acre, so Essex County sits 20% above its neighbors.
| # | County | $/acre | vs Essex | 1-yr change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Essex County | $77.50 | — | — |
| 2 | Middlesex County | $64.50 | −$13 | −9.2% |
In the NASS All Counties district, Essex County ranks #6 of 11 on non-irrigated cropland rent.
Can your crop budget carry $77.50?
The county average is what tenants paid, not what the ground can earn. Plug in your own yield, price and costs to see the most rent your budget supports, and how that compares with the 2026 non-irrigated cropland average for Essex County. The starting values are a generic corn example, not Essex County figures. Replace them.
Run your numbers
Example values are loaded to show how the tool works. Replace every field with your own records or planning assumptions. Nothing entered here leaves your browser.
What the assumptions produce
Residual after non-land costs and target return.
Per-acre ceiling multiplied by rented acres.
Calculated rent ceiling as a share of crop revenue.
Yield revenue plus other entered revenue.
Compare your result with the Essex County non-irrigated cropland average.
More All Counties district counties
All Massachusetts counties →The fight over the ground
Red-Dye Diesel Comes to the Road, but Tax Confusion Lingers
Trump's executive order opens on-road use of red-dye diesel for farmers, but tax exemptions remain murky. Experts warn the relief may not go as far as promised.
Illinois Farmland Rents Fall as Farm Costs Tighten
Cropland rents have dipped for a second consecutive year in Illinois, offering renters brief relief as input costs and debt pressure squeeze farm finances across the Corn Belt.
Farmers Face Crushing Debt Amid Market Volatility
Fertilizer prices, disease outbreaks, and market fluctuations are taking a toll on farmers' finances. Experts weigh in on the challenges ahead.
Where these numbers come from
- Every rent on these pages is a published estimate from the USDA NASS Cash Rents Survey: the average cash rent paid per acre for non-irrigated cropland, irrigated cropland and pasture. We pull the 2024–2026 county and state series straight from Quick Stats.
- NASS skips counties with too few survey reports, or withholds them to protect respondents, and lumps them into an "other counties" total. Those counties get no page here, and missing years show as a dash. We do not estimate, average or interpolate around the gaps.
- The coefficient of variation (CV) is NASS's measure of sampling precision. Lower is tighter; the higher the CV, the wider the real range around the county figure.
- "Bordering counties" are the ones that share a boundary under the Census Bureau county adjacency file, including across state lines.
- An average rent is a benchmark, not a fair price for a specific field. Soil, drainage, fertility, improvements and lease terms all move the number.
Data last refreshed October 8, 2026.