Skip to content
Friday, Jul 24
Save US Farms
Rural farmland under open sky
the land grab

Foreign Farmland Disclosure Gets Real: USDA Cuts Threshold to 10%

USDA proposes sweeping AFIDA rule overhaul, lowering foreign ownership reporting threshold from 50% to just 10% in historic shift on land control.

By Save US Farms Desk · Published · 2 min read · Photo: Moses Londo / Pexels

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving to dramatically tighten how it tracks and regulates foreign ownership of American farmland, proposing the most significant overhaul of farmland disclosure rules in nearly 50 years.

Under the proposed changes to the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA), the USDA would lower the foreign ownership threshold from 50% to 10%—meaning any foreign interest in a U.S. farmland company equal to or greater than 10% would trigger federal reporting requirements. Some versions of the rule could go even lower, to 5%.

Currently, 46 million acres of U.S. agricultural land are under foreign ownership or lease, representing 3.6% of all privately held farmland. That’s roughly the size of Pennsylvania, and it’s growing. Recent USDA data shows the fastest growth in foreign holdings in New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma, driven by both sovereign wealth funds and corporate investors betting on American agriculture.

Why the Threshold Matters

The 50% threshold, set when AFIDA passed in 1978, was designed to flag corporations where foreign interests held outright control. But it became a loophole. Shell companies, investment vehicles, and holding structures—where no single foreign entity held 50%—could quietly accumulate millions of acres without ever triggering AFIDA filing requirements. The foreign investor didn’t need control to concentrate ownership. They just needed to stay below 50%.

A 10% threshold closes that gap. It treats significant foreign financial stakes—short of control—the same way the law treats actual control. The proposed rule also broadens what counts as “agricultural land,” tightens exemptions for family farms and trusts, and expands beneficial ownership disclosures, meaning foreign investors can’t hide behind layers of corporate structure.

The Wider Consolidation Picture

Foreign ownership is only part of the land-grab story. Domestic private equity and corporate agriculture have been rolling up farmland at accelerating rates. But foreign holdings—especially from state-backed entities and multinational corporations—raise national security and food sovereignty concerns that Congress and state legislatures have flagged as urgent. By July 2026, 29 states have passed their own foreign ownership restrictions, many targeting “foreign adversary” nations like China, Russia, and Iran.

The USDA proposal also transfers administration of AFIDA enforcement to the Office of Homeland Security and increases penalties for non-disclosure—signaling that the White House views farmland as critical infrastructure worth defending.

What Farmers and Policymakers Say

The proposed rule is now open for public comment through August 10, 2026. Farm organizations and landowner advocacy groups are split. Some see the tightening as overdue protection against hostile actors and speculative capital. Others worry about chilling legitimate foreign agricultural investment and cross-border trade.

For beginning farmers and family operations, the stricter disclosure regime could reduce the competitive pressure from foreign-backed land buyers. But it won’t address the other half of the consolidation crisis: domestic consolidation by PE firms and corporate agriculture, which don’t trigger AFIDA at all.

The rule also won’t restore farmland to farmers—just make the foreign transfers more visible. That’s the fight for a different tool, like the Farmland for Farmers Act.

Found this useful? Share it.

Related coverage