Thompson's H-2A Overhaul Would Slash Worker Wages, Boost Farm Profit
The Securing Agriculture's Workforce Act would let migrant workers stay year-round while cutting their pay. Farm-worker groups already oppose it.
On June 30, House Agriculture Committee Chairman G.T. Thompson (R-PA) introduced what he frames as a workforce solution: the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act of 2026, which would reshape the nation’s H-2A guestworker program by allowing year-round visas and significantly lowering labor costs for farmers. Farm-worker advocates say the bill does exactly what its critics feared—it trades worker protections for agricultural industry profit.
The bill’s centerpiece is deceptive simplicity: let migrant workers stay longer on H-2A visas, and cut what farmers pay to recruit and house them. For growers facing input costs and commodity price pressure, year-round labor at lower cost sounds like survival. But for the workers themselves, the math is starker: lower wages, longer commitment, and less leverage to demand safe conditions.
The farmworker-led opposition was immediate. The UFW Foundation and allied groups announced they oppose legislation that would displace American workers and depress wages—the core complaint about H-2A expansion since its birth. The program already enables employers to recruit foreign labor when they claim no domestic workers are available; the real floor on wages isn’t the minimum wage, it’s what migrant workers can be paid without triggering labor-shortage complaints from industry.
Thompson’s bill arrives at a moment when farmworker movements have already pushed for H-2A accountability. Recent coverage has shown how H-2A certifications paper over a labor crisis and how wage guides don’t protect workers in practice. Cutting the cost of recruiting H-2A workers—the intended effect of year-round visas and looser requirements—sends a clear signal: wages will drift lower, and the supply of compliant labor will increase.
The bill’s framing as a “workforce solution” masks what it actually does: it subsidizes farm labor by making temporary migration permanent and cheaper. For growers drowning in debt and chemical costs, that’s rational. For workers betting their livelihood on seasonal contracts, it’s a wage floor collapsing in real time.
Committee votes haven’t been scheduled yet. Expect the farm-labor fight to consume the next legislative cycle.
Found this useful? Share it.